Archive for category leadership

Ministry vs. Discipleship

My friend Sean Eppers posted some content on the Woodlands Point Pastor’s blog that Tyler David and I did on “Ministry vs. Discipleship” for one of our staff meetings awhile ago.  Below is a sample:

Ministry Discipleship
Reactive Proactive
Ministry tends to involve a much lower level of relational investment, and for both parties there is a relative degree of anonymity Discipleship requires a high degree of vulnerability for both parties
Meets immediate, felt needs Transforms lives and success is replication
Often times leads to immediate results and draws crowds Often painstakingly slow and difficult with one step forward and two steps back

You can find the rest here.  Thanks for posting Sean!

No Comments

Called | JD Greear

I loved JD Greear‘s thoughts on calling as they are seeking to plant 1000 churches in 40 years.  Below is the excerpt:

First, calling is not:

* Necessarily a Burning Bush/Damascus Road/Warm Fuzzy experience. We all want the Mark Driscoll, “God told me to marry Grace, plant churches, and train men” kind of experience, and that happens sometimes. But the “burning bush” experience is not how most of God’s servants are called–either in the Bible or in church history. Charles Spurgeon was clear he never got anything like that. I didn’t either. The only bushes that have ever spoke to me were the ones at Southpoint that have the music coming out of them.

* A special instruction to live missionally. Radical commitment to the Great Commission and radical sacrifice on its behalf are not the special assignment of a chosen few, but a mandate for all. Sometimes I think we have invented this whole language of calling to mask the fact that 90% of church-going Christians aren’t living missionally.

* An excuse to passively wait for God rather than actively pursue ministry. Most of God’s miracles in the Bible happened not because someone did what He told them to do, but because they saw an opportunity to advance the Kingdom of God and they asked God to help them.

Rather, calling is:

* A church-recognized combination of your God-given abilities, giftings and experiences with opportunities God gives you. Ability + Affinity + Need = Calling (usually speaking).

via jdgreear.com: What it means to be called//SENDRDU.

I really like that he emphasizes the communal, church-centric view of calling, as it highlights the difference of our tendency today toward an individualized “calling gnosticism” – an individual hears directly from God, without any confirmation from Scripture or community, and chases a calling to seminary or some institution outside their primary fellowship.  My story of “calling” to vocational ministry happened because my church leaders recognized my giftings, and because I found a passion in ministry and there was an opportunity for it in our local body.

This definition of calling highlights two very important things: the church AND the individual.  First the church must have a passion for helping people identify their abilities and gifts, and provide opportunities to exercise them in ministry. Secondly, the individual needs to have some requisite skill and a passion for the ministry, not simply a general inkling that they may want to do it.

That’s not to say God doesn’t operate in the directed calling of an individual, I just don’t think it is normative for believers.  We know God’s calling through His Word, the community of believers, and the leading of the Holy Spirit.

Thoughts?

4 Comments

Discipleship and Ministry

I’ve been spending some time lately reflecting on my ministry and the coming season.  As my role has continued to change and our church has continued to grow, the pressures have changed and my time is increasingly spoken for. In addition, it seems like there is always a person or a task that needs immediate attention.

The ministry of Jesus and Paul have been speaking wisdom to me lately in the difference between discipleship and ministry.  Although both men spent copious amounts of time ministering to both the masses and individuals alike, they never departed from a focused investment in a small group of men.  I am noticing in myself the ease with which I get lost in ministry–the crowds crowd out my discipleship.

The conclusion for me has been, at bare minimum, I need to be investing in a small group of people on a weekly basis, and inviting those individuals more frequently into my life and  ministry.  The commitment to discipling a group, and not simply leading several ministries, provides for me accountability, as well as a continued perspective to the challenges our body faces in pursuing the vision God has given us.

God’s word to me has been this: don’t let ministry replace discipleship–it’s the road to failure.

9 Comments

Between Two Worlds: Calvin’s Death-Bed Charge to Older and Younger Men

The following quote is from Between Two Worlds: Calvin’s Death-Bed Charge to Older and Younger Men on Douglas Bond’s The Betrayal: A Novel on John Calvin (P&R, 2009).

Here’s how John Calvin wisely charged older and younger men just one month prior to his death (p. 369):

April 27, 1564, Calvin called members of the City Council to his side. Extending an emaciated hand in blessing, his body a living cadaver, he blessed and exhorted them. I render here only a portion thereof. “You older ones be not jealous of the gifts which the younger generation has received, but be glad and praise the Lord who has given them.

“And you younger men, be humble and seek not to achieve greater things than you can do; for youth is seldom void of ambition and tends to despise the opinions of others.”

Certainly something I need to hear as an ambitious young man!

1 Comment

Leadership | Contexts

Before the next section, below is a short personal aside:

As I’m working on writing this series of posts on leadership, it is proving to be a really great learning experience.  Although it seems incredibly pretentious to write about this topic, especially when I have such little experience, I decided that it is beneficial to share what is going on in my head and heart.  Hopefully it will be an encouragement to you to think through your own leadership, and not merely another didactic lesson on leadership principles.

As I have been looking at myself and my leadership, I have a few different contexts in which I am currently leading:

Myself

I’m not sure that this actually counts as “leadership”, but it is generally good practice to think on leading yourself first.  If I am not putting into practice what I am teaching and imparting to others, I may have succeeded in leading them, but I have failed myself.

This means that I am personally living and applying what I am calling people to.  If I desire the people I am leading to live like missionaries, then I better be implementing those principles into my own life.  If I am leading ministries toward a strategic end, I had better be towing my own weight in the execution of that plan.  I think there is a great risk as you grow in leadership to becoming something of an “arm chair quarterback”, or a person who just calls the shots but isn’t intimately invested in the game.

Self-leadership is the process of developing character that runs deep, and manifests itself in other areas of leadership.

Family

God has blessed me with a great family, and as a husband and dad I am called to lead our family towards Christ.  I find that this context is the best indicator of my self-leadership, and the truest position of my heart in leadership.  It turns out that it was pretty important to Paul in assessing a leader as well, so much so, that effectively leading your family is a qualification for eldership.

Your family sees you without any filter at most points, and know you more intimately than anyone you are around, so it’s the first place to see what you are really made of as a leader.  For those of you without families, I’d suggest looking at how you’re doing in leading the people you live with.

Family is the mirror for the character you are developing in self-leadership.

Ministry

I have the opportunity to serve in leadership in a variety of ways within our church on an organizational and pastoral level.  These tend to be the skills I hone in on and spend a lot of time developing, because I spend so much time in this context, and my livelihood depends on it.  It is also a place I enjoy a lot, because it involves organizational skill, technical execution, and personal investment and development, on a variety of different time-scales and different ways.

I’ve noticed in myself how easy it is to abandon developing in the first and second contexts in favor of this one.  I think the reason is that we often get the most recognition for success if we are effective in this area.  It’s dangerously easy to be successful in this kind of leadership while ignoring the first two, but the natural consequence is cultivating an identity in something other than Christ and the character He hones in us.  Recognition of success and the fear of failure can drive me a long way…

As I have been reflecting, there is a great deal of commonality between each area, but also different skills required for doing each.  My two year old son doesn’t respond the same way to the skills I use to lead a college student.  Although the character needed is often the same, the tools that I use are fundamentally different.  I’ll look at some context specific skills in the next post.

1 Comment