Archive for March, 2009
Get in the Fight
Posted by Todd Engstrom in austin stone on March 4, 2009
This post contains a link to one of the most convicting sermons I have heard Matt Carter preach, and it is a clarion call for the consumer church to engage in the mission of God.
It’s called “Get in the Fight”, and it is an exhortation for the individual believer to use their spiritual gifts in obedience to the Scripture. I would highly recommend giving it a listen!
image: One on One by: ElMarto
Coffee Kills
Posted by Todd Engstrom in personal on March 3, 2009
Ever wondered how much caffeine it would take to kill you?
Below are my results:

Coffee Kills
Scriptural Election: The Third Way
Posted by Todd Engstrom in theology on March 2, 2009

I found this article as I was preparing for my teaching on the doctrines of salvation, and particularly on election. The quote below is very insightful
Thesis 23: We must affirm that God creates what he elects rather than that he selects out of what exists.
Israel is called into existence. Election is tied to promise and the seed of Israel is not the product of selection but of creation. God created what he elected. Election is the creation of something out of its opposite—possibility out of impossibility. It is a matter of creation rather than a parallel to rejection.
The focus in our doctrine of election, therefore, must not be on selection. Election is a creative act. In biblical thought Israel, Christ, and the Church are not “existing realities that God selectively chooses out of a number of extant Israels, Christs, or churches. . . . They are created by the dynamics of election, for they are what they are only by virtue of their election.”
The thought that election is out of God’s creative, life-giving power is an excellent one, and a great demonstration of why I cherish the doctrine. In election, He is calling the dead to life, not sifting based on some selection criteria. This helped me to articulate a good defense to those who see election as mechanical and deterministic, and ultimately cold and unfair.



Comments